Posts Tagged ‘New York Times’

I Did Not Expect Manohla Dargis To Like This

Thursday, July 21st, 2011

But she did. A lot. Here’s the proof.

It’s Just Sex. We’re Just Friends. You Know the Rules. Etc., Etc.
By MANOHLA DARGIS
Published: July 21, 2011

“Friends With Benefits,” a breezy, speedy and (no kidding) funny comedy with a nicely matched Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis that is about love and sex in the age of social networking, gets some of its juice and tang partly by trash-talking its own genre. The setup is familiar, as are the essential elements: a single man and a single woman, two battered hearts yet a pair of resilient, eager, pretty bodies. But Ms. Kunis’s character is dark and savvy, not blond and dippy, and when she comically rails against an unseen Katherine Heigl you may sigh with relief (fingers crossed) that you’re watching the “Scream” of romantic comedies.

Much as the first “Scream” movie gave horror cinema a jolt with self-consciously knowing characters who knew the bloody ins and outs of the genre — and were sadistically subjected to those clichés firsthand — “Friends With Benefits” starts from the premise that its characters, and you, are sick of the romantic comedy clichés they may secretly, or not so secretly, adore. In other words, the director Will Gluck, who wrote the script with Keith Merryman and David A. Newman, doesn’t just want to have his romantic comedy cake and eat it too, he also wants to throw it in your face and make you laugh as you lick the icing off your lips. The results are about as naughty as that sounds (not very), but it also makes for a fairly giggling good time.

A corporate headhunter but, you know, cool, Jamie (Ms. Kunis) meets Dylan, a Web site art director (Mr. Timberlake) , when she lures him to New York to interview for a spot at a men’s magazine. They meet cute — she’s scrambling atop an airport baggage carousel and he’s wide-eyed and willing —and they’re soon off and running, or really walking and talking, mostly talking. She needs him to take the job to earn her bonus and so sweetens the deal by showing him around what she calls the real New York. That this tour includes a flash mob shouldn’t be held against Jamie, not least because Ms. Kunis is fast proving that she’s a gift that keeps giving to mainstream romantic comedy.

One reason is that she doesn’t play the stock girl, teary and needy or plucky and needy, but rather a woman who can go joking round for round against men. Ms. Kunis looks itty-bitty enough to hang on a charm bracelet, but her energy is so invigorating and expansive and her presence so vibrant that she fills the screen. If she continues to score roles like this, she might even be able to break out of the genre. Of course she’ll probably be forced to compete with the equally appealing and tiny — if paler and pinker — Emma Stone, who, with several other name actors, makes the most of a tiny role. Mr. Gluck directed Ms. Stone in “Easy A,” a lightly (very lightly) self-aware flick about a high-schooler play-acting as Hester Prynne.

The genre self-consciousness in “Friends With Benefits” extends from the throwaway “Pretty Woman” nods to a goofy (and entertainingly bogus) romantic movie within a movie that Jamie and Dylan watch after their initial business relationship turns into something a bit more touchy-feely and squealy. Having both been dumped, they decide that an occasional quickie with a friend is a perfect post-romance pick-me-up. Much like the recent similarly themed if less satisfying and cruder “No Strings Attached,” “Friends With Benefits” uses sex and bared skin to get at questions about the possibility of romantic love between true male and female equals. After all, without Mommy and Daddy, religion, community or a ticking clock forcing the issue, what’s the point of settling down (or just settling)?

Mr. Gluck largely distinguishes himself in this movie by the casting (Woody Harrelson plays a randy gay colleague of Dylan’s, and Patricia Clarkson shows up as Jamie’s mom) and by directing the actors to talk at warp speed. Jamie and Dylan do more than trade teasing laughs, they slam their lines like Chinese Ping-Pong champs, hurling the quips so fast at times that it’s a wonder they don’t gaspingly reach for the oxygen. That speed makes the duds easier to miss and the dreary heavy stuff easier to ignore, and may of course also remind you of the screwball comedies of the 1930s and ’40s, a comparison that Mr. Gluck hopefully flags with a conspicuous poster for “It Happened One Night.”

Clark Gable and Claudette Colbert kept their distance with a blanket in that 1934 gem, whereas only their Calvins usually get between Jamie and Dylan, and rarely for long. That said, despite the sex and chatter, which includes some amusing bossy instruction, it’s the sentiment that keeps you hooked.

Too bad the whole thing is so very hard on the eyes: “Friends With Benefits” is certainly likable, but it may be the ugliest digitally shot movie ever released by a major studio. The problem isn’t the serviceable shooting, the camera setups and the like, but the poor digital quality that makes New York look like a blurred Xerox copy and puts so much yellow in the actors’ faces, especially Ms. Kunis’s, you may think it’s their livers that are giving them trouble instead of their hearts.

I hate the title of the movie and I hate the idea of the plot even more (talk about predictable), but referencing “It Happened One Night” and screwball comedies of the ’30s and ’40s works for me. I’ll be going to see this.

 

 

Share

This Article Really Depressed Me

Tuesday, June 14th, 2011

And I’m still depressed, even though it’s been two days since I read the article.

It was in Sunday’s New York Times and it was film critic Manohla Dargis’ take on the fact that women are a disappearing breed in the movies nowadays and that they’ll be even more invisible this summer. Although I know Dargis is right and I spend way too much time bemoaning the scarcity of women on the big screen, it still bummed me out to read her piece.

For example, her first paragraph:

“If you’re a woman who roared, snorted or sniggered at “Bridesmaids,” if you like watching other women on screen, you should see it again. Because that hit comedy written by Kristen Wiig and Annie Mumolo and directed by Paul Feig, turns out to be one of the few occasions this summer when you can enjoy a movie about and with women released by a major studio.”

What does this all mean for screen adaptations of my novels? Nothing good. I’ve been told by any number of “industry people” that rom coms are over, that movies for women must be raunchy like “Bridesmaids” or they won’t get made, that stories about women don’t sell overseas, that women will go to see men in films but men won’t go to see women.

How did we get here? And more importantly, how do we get out of here? I loved Nora Ephron’s movies and I could watch appealing actresses fall in and out of love with the men of their dreams every night of the week. Am I a disappearing breed too?

 

 

 

Share

Rainy Night Dinner

Sunday, March 20th, 2011

With the forecast calling for torrential rain and high winds, there was no way we were going out last night. So Michael decided to try one of the Martha Rose Shulman recipes he’d seen on the New York Times‘ “Wellness” blog. This is a man who, as I’ve said, considers ketchup to be his favorite vegetable; I was skeptical that he’d really cook something labeled a “recipe for health.”

I was wrong. He broadened his horizons and his palate and made Shulman’s Lentils and Carrots with Olive Oil.

Photo: Andrew Scrivani/New York Times

Can I just tell you how good it was? We had it with roast chicken, and I was in heaven – and, shockingly, so was Michael. Total comfort food. Here’s the recipe.

1 cup brown, green or black lentils, rinsed

3 cups water

1/4 cup extra virgin olive oil

1 onion, halved lengthwise, then sliced thin across the grain

1 teaspoon coriander seeds (we omitted these)

4 garlic cloves, minced

1 1/2 pounds carrots, peeled and sliced thin (about 4 cups sliced)

1 tablespoon tomato paste dissolved in 1 cup water

1 teaspoon sugar

Salt to taste

1/2 cup chopped fresh mint

1. Combine the lentils with 3 cups water in a saucepan, and bring to a boil. Reduce the heat, cover and simmer for 15 minutes. Set a strainer over a bowl, and drain.

2. Heat the oil over medium heat in a heavy casserole or skillet. Add the onion and coriander seeds. Cook, stirring, until the onion is tender, about five minutes. Add the garlic and carrots and salt to taste. Cook, stirring, for two to three minutes until the carrots begin to soften. Stir in the dissolved tomato paste, sugar and lentils. Add 1 to 1 1/2 cups of the cooking water from the lentils (enough to cover the lentils), salt to taste and half the mint. Bring to a simmer, and simmer uncovered for 15 to 20 minutes until the lentils are tender and much of the liquid has evaporated. Taste and adjust salt. Remove from the heat, sprinkle on the remaining mint and serve, or allow to cool and serve at room temperature with cooked whole grains, like bulgur or quinoa.

Yield: Serves four to six.

Share

Will I Wake Up Tomorrow To An Olbermann Announcement?

Monday, February 7th, 2011

According to the NYT, Keith will announce tomorrow morning that he’s launching a new show on – wait for it – Current TV. What the hell is Current TV? I just looked it up. Here’s one of its prime time hits.

Kill It, Cook It, Eat It

In each episode of “Kill It, Cook It, Eat It,” a diverse group of participants is challenged to procure their main course the old-fashioned way: by hunting and killing their chosen prey, butchering it in the slaughterhouse, helping to prepare it in the kitchen, and ultimately sampling it at the dinner table. Some may enjoy the process while others recoil, but for each diner it’s an intense journey that just may change their perspectives – and appetites – forever.

I checked my Cox Cable guide to see if I even get Current TV. I don’t. But maybe that’ll change. The Times said Al Gore is one of the channel’s founders/owners and he lives in my ‘hood.

(courtesy: Huffington Post)

(No, my house isn’t that big, and we don’t have a pool.) Maybe Gore will arrange for Cox to carry the new “Countdown.” Actually, I guess Keith won’t be calling his new show that; it must be in his contract with MSNBC that he has to have a different name the next time around. All I know is that I’ve missed his pontificating since he and his latest network parted ways. Rachel Maddow is very smart, but Keith shook the place up. I wish him luck in his new venture. Or should I wish his bosses luck? I give the relationship a year, tops.

Share

Michael’s Super Bowl Meal (Minus The Super Bowl)

Sunday, February 6th, 2011

I’ve already written about my antipathy toward football, so there’s no need to go into that. Michael would have been interested in the Super Bowl if the Giants were in it, but since they weren’t, he couldn’t have cared less.

That said, he did want to have a special Super Bowl dinner. And so he cooked himself one: Braised Pork Shoulder. Not the dish I would have prepared, but he loves his meat and gravy – a total comfort food guy. All I can say is that the house smelled like the best restaurant in town during the hours and hours the pork was simmering in the vegetable/herb-infused broth. The result?

I’m not much of a pork eater, but this baby was melt-in-your-mouth tender. And the accompanying noodles were the perfect fit for the gravy. Deee-licious. Want the recipe? Here it is, courtesy of Mark Bittman, who writes “The Minimalist” column in the New York Times. Try it. You won’t be sorry, I swear. Plus, it’s very economical.

ONE of the great paradoxes of the modern supermarket is that the
best cuts of meat are sometimes the cheapest. This is especially true
of pork: the ultralean, tasteless tenderloin often costs four times as
much as the nicely marbled and forgiving shoulder.
The shoulder is forgiving because it’s tender enough to undercook
and still be fine. It is also fatty enough to cook more or less forever
and still be soft enough to cut with a fork and trade flavors with
whatever is in the same vessel.
Pork shoulder is not strong-tasting meat, but it stands up to many other ingredients
anyway: here I combine it with red wine, carrots and garlic. The first provides much
needed fruitiness and acidity; the second adds a profound sweetness that balances the
wine; and the third — well, almost no meaty stew is complete without garlic.
It’s an easily executed stew, one you can make even in a slow cooker. You need not even
brown the meat first, though there is some benefit in doing so: the flavor will become
more complex and the dish’s color will improve as well. In the end, the whole is far
greater than the sum of its parts, believe me.
There are a couple of tricks, both derived from classic French cooking. The first is the
addition of stock, which will bump the flavor up to another level. The second is the
reduction of the sauce to intensify its flavor. You can also add a little bit of butter, which
somehow smoothes everything out and binds it all together, in an almost metaphysical
way.
Thus a simple, inexpensive dish becomes a nearly glorious one.
BRAISED PORK WITH RED WINE
Time: About 2 hours
2 pounds boneless pork shoulder, cut into large chunks
Salt and pepper
2 cups fruity red wine, like Beaujolais or Burgundy (pinot noir)
1 cup good stock, or water
1 pound fat carrots, peeled and cut into large chunks
10 cloves garlic, more or less, peeled
2 tablespoons butter
Cooked egg noodles for serving
Chopped fresh parsley leaves for garnish.
1. Combine pork, salt and pepper to taste, wine, stock, carrots and garlic in a saucepan,
Dutch oven or slow cooker. Bring to a boil, then adjust heat so that mixture simmers
steadily but not vigorously. (If using a slow cooker, just turn it to ”high” and let cook for
at least three hours.)
2. Cook, stirring every half-hour or so, until meat is very tender and just about falling
apart, at least an hour and most likely a bit longer. Use a slotted spoon to remove solid
ingredients to a bowl, then turn heat to high. (If using a slow cooker, transfer liquid to a
saucepan for this step.) Reduce to about a cup, or even less. Taste and adjust seasoning,
then lower heat and stir in butter.
3. Add solids to sauce and reheat. Serve over egg noodles, garnished with parsley.
Yield: 4 servings.

Share

A Rave Review For A Chick Lit Novel In The NYT?

Saturday, February 5th, 2011

I was nonplussed the other day when I read Times‘ book critic Michiko Kakutani’s review of the new novel by “I Don’t Know How She Does It” author Allison Pearson. I liked Pearson’s first novel – very smart and witty in a British, Bridget Jones sort of way – so I’m not surprised that her latest is entertaining. What surprised me was that Kakutani thought so. Take a look.

Just as Allison Pearson’s 2002 best seller, “I Don’t Know How She Does It,” proved she had perfect pitch for channeling a stressed-out working mom in hedge-fund-crazy London, so her new novel, “I Think I Love You,” shows she has the same gift for channeling an insecure 13-year-old in 1974 with a mad crush on the pop star David Cassidy. You know, David Cassidy of “The Partridge Family” — he with the Bambi eyes and feathered mop top, who was the love object of millions of young girls in that era of bell-bottom pants, platform shoes and Mary Quant eye shadow.

A romantic comedy tailor-made for the movies, “I Think I Love You” is a sort of witty mash-up of “Mean Girls,” “Bridget Jones’s Diary” and one of Nancy Meyers’s fairy tales for the middle aged, with a little nod along the way to “Cyrano de Bergerac.” Though we know after two dozen pages or so exactly where this novel is headed, Ms. Pearson writes with such humor and affection for her characters that we’re perfectly happy to sit back and see how she steers her people toward that happy ending. It’s a novel that’s as light and sugary as a pop song, but if its plot is a little too predictable and jerry-built, the book still easily transcends the chick-lit genre. It showcases its author’s skills as an observer and her uncanny ability to render on the page exactly what it’s like to be a teenage girl, trying to navigate the merciless social hierarchy at school, while pouring all her yearnings into the impossible dream of somehow, someday becoming Mrs. David Cassidy and moving to Los Angeles.

In the first half of the book, Ms. Pearson — a staff writer for The Daily Telegraph in London, who, as the book’s afterword makes clear, once had a teenage crush on David Cassidy herself — allows her heroine, Petra, to talk to us directly. Petra, who lives in a small town in Wales, tells us about sending a poem to David, and taking more time choosing the right color note paper than writing the actual poem:

“I settled on yellow, because it seemed more mature than pink. I thought all the other girls would choose pink, and part of loving him was finding better ways to please him, so he would know how much more I cared.”

Petra tells us how she hated smutty jokes about David: “I suppose they were an unwelcome reminder that he was common property. Stupid, really. I don’t know how you can get the idea that someone who has the biggest fan club in history, bigger than Elvis’s or the Beatles’, is yours and yours alone, but you can, you really can.”

Petra also tells us how she felt his song “I Am a Clown” was full of secret coded messages that she alone could decipher: “David felt lonely and trapped in his pop-star life, and only I could hear him. And you’d never have guessed it, but being able to feel a bit sorry for him was even better than thinking he was perfect.”

Intercut with Petra’s lovelorn reminiscences are chapters about a decent but somewhat hapless young fellow named Bill — a recent college grad, who has the job of ghost-writing letters from David to his fans, which appear in a publication called The Essential David Cassidy Magazine. Bill loathes his job, and lives in fear that his girlfriend, Ruth — who thinks he is a serious rock journalist — will discover his secret.

Needless to say, Petra and Bill are placed on a collision course. They will not only cross paths at a big Cassidy concert in London — an insanely chaotic event at which a girl dies in the crush of fans — but, as these things go in this sort of romantic comedy, they will also meet again as adults, many years and emotional miles later. Petra, by then, is 38, with a 13-year-old daughter who’s got her own teenage crush (on Leonardo DiCaprio); Petra’s husband has recently left her for a younger woman. As for Bill, he oversees a large stable of magazines and is conveniently divorced and melancholy about finding anything like true love.

Clunky as this plot machinery might be, Ms. Pearson does a winning job of making Petra and Bill, and Petra’s best friend and fellow David worshipper — the sunny, good-hearted and slightly ditsy Sharon — as funny and incisive as characters created by, say, Nick Hornby or Stephen Fry, though with considerably more tenderness and felt emotion. Her portraits somehow manage to combine effervescence with earnestness, a finely tuned sense of absurdity with nostalgia, satiric wit with genuine warmth.

Ms. Pearson captures the awful weight of groupthink that can make high school miserable for teenage girls (and the unforgiving notions of beauty and cool, which determine the pecking order there) with the same authority that she brought to bear on office politics and the politics of motherhood in “I Don’t Know How She Does It.”

She shows how Petra’s crush on David Cassidy is really a kind of rehearsal for the love and passion she wants to one day lavish on a real boy in real life, and how those youthful emotions both endure — and are transformed — as the years and decades tick by. And somehow, along the way, she also manages to reinvent the clichés of the midlife crisis novel, recounting how both Petra and David find a way to alter the trajectories of their lives, which they thought had stalled or plateaued for good. In doing so, Ms. Pearson has written a groovy little novel whose charms easily erase any objections the reader might have to the prepackaged and heavily borrowed plot.

Not only do I intend to buy the book after reading the review, but I will go back to work on my own fiction with renewed optimism. This review is good news for those of us who write novels for and about women, it really is.

Share